Talk:SDLC v1

From OSM Public Wiki
Revision as of 11:14, 26 April 2016 by Garciadeblas (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Regarding the split of budget weeks for each SDLC, I suggest to move from 16 weeks for Feature Development to 20 weeks. Regarding the workflow for the design phase, it was su...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Regarding the split of budget weeks for each SDLC, I suggest to move from 16 weeks for Feature Development to 20 weeks.

Regarding the workflow for the design phase, it was suggested:

  • Key Scope / Themes identified in first 2 weeks (eg. 80% of the scope for the release)
  • Some idea of Demo Scenarios in first 2 weeks
  • Key Architecture / Design artifacts delivered in the first 4 weeks, in markdown, as part of the git repo
  • Key Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft) delivered in first 4 weeks (think TDD)

That workflow does not take into account feature collection and prioritization by TSC. I suggest to take it into account in the life cycle:

  • Explicit Call for features and use cases:
    • Weeks 1-3
    • Input from EUAG and the community to TSC
  • Feature prioritization and identification of module requirements:
    • Week 4
    • Prioritization by TSC
    • Identification of module requirements per feature by TSC and MDL
  • Design artifacts/blueprints in markdown, as part of the git repo:
    • By MDG Leads and Committers
    • Weeks 5-7
  • Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft)
    • Weeks 5-7
  • Coding:
    • From week 8 or sooner depending on blueprints availability, up to week 20.
  • Feature hardening
    • Weeks 21-25
  • Documentation
    • Weeks 21-25