Talk: SDLC v1: Difference between revisions
From OSM Public Wiki
Garciadeblas (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Garciadeblas (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
**Feature hardening: Weeks 21-25 | **Feature hardening: Weeks 21-25 | ||
**Documentation: Weeks 21-25 | **Documentation: Weeks 21-25 | ||
For release 1, the call for features can start now, without the need to have release 0 ready. |
Revision as of 11:26, 26 April 2016
Regarding the split of budget weeks for each SDLC, the current split does not take into account feature collection and prioritization by TSC. I suggest to take it into account in the life cycle. Besides, I suggest to make feature hardening and documentation stay in parallel.
My proposal below:
- Call for features and prioritization: 4 weeks
- Explicit Call for features and use cases:
- Weeks 1-3
- Input from EUAG and the community to TSC
- Feature prioritization and identification of module requirements:
- Week 4
- Prioritization by TSC
- Identification of module requirements per feature by TSC and MDL
- Explicit Call for features and use cases:
- Feature development: 16 weeks
- Design artifacts/blueprints in markdown, as part of the git repo:
- By MDG Leads and Committers
- Weeks 5-7
- Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft)
- Weeks 5-7
- Coding:
- From week 8 or sooner depending on blueprints availability, up to week 20.
- Design artifacts/blueprints in markdown, as part of the git repo:
- Feature hardening and documentation: 5 weeks
- Feature hardening: Weeks 21-25
- Documentation: Weeks 21-25
For release 1, the call for features can start now, without the need to have release 0 ready.