Talk: SDLC v1: Difference between revisions
From OSM Public Wiki
Garciadeblas (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Regarding the split of budget weeks for each SDLC, I suggest to move from 16 weeks for Feature Development to 20 weeks. Regarding the workflow for the design phase, it was su...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 11:14, 26 April 2016
Regarding the split of budget weeks for each SDLC, I suggest to move from 16 weeks for Feature Development to 20 weeks.
Regarding the workflow for the design phase, it was suggested:
- Key Scope / Themes identified in first 2 weeks (eg. 80% of the scope for the release)
- Some idea of Demo Scenarios in first 2 weeks
- Key Architecture / Design artifacts delivered in the first 4 weeks, in markdown, as part of the git repo
- Key Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft) delivered in first 4 weeks (think TDD)
That workflow does not take into account feature collection and prioritization by TSC. I suggest to take it into account in the life cycle:
- Explicit Call for features and use cases:
- Weeks 1-3
- Input from EUAG and the community to TSC
- Feature prioritization and identification of module requirements:
- Week 4
- Prioritization by TSC
- Identification of module requirements per feature by TSC and MDL
- Design artifacts/blueprints in markdown, as part of the git repo:
- By MDG Leads and Committers
- Weeks 5-7
- Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft)
- Weeks 5-7
- Coding:
- From week 8 or sooner depending on blueprints availability, up to week 20.
- Feature hardening
- Weeks 21-25
- Documentation
- Weeks 21-25