View source for SDLC v1

== INTRODUCTION ==
* We should have a well defined SDLC
* The content below is an early draft
* Anything shockingly bad? email us @ osm_tech@list.etsi.org

== PROCESS PROPOSAL ==
# Preference for agile design and development - implies iterative approach, and should be incremental.
## Iterative means a subset of a feature / epic is delivered, feedback received, then continue.
## Incremental means a feature / epic is "done done".
# Preference to follow best practices. Some Examples:
## OpenStack Model - http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html
## Ubuntu - Time Based Releases https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeBasedReleases

== EACH SDLC ==
# is 6 months .. 25 weeks budget 
# Feature Development: 16 weeks ... four milestones boxed to four weeks
## Each MDG to agree on iterative frequency, ideally between 1-2 week iterations
## Key Scope / Themes identified in first 2 weeks (eg. 80% of the scope for the release)
## Some idea of Demo Scenarios in first 2 weeks
## Key Architecture / Design artifacts delivered in the first 4 weeks, in markdown, as part of the git repo 
## Key Acceptance Criteria and Tests (first draft) delivered in first 4 weeks (think TDD)
## Each milestone may also include sustaining / support work on the previous release
# Feature Hardening: 4 weeks
## Tackle prioritized bugs, close all high priority bugs for the release
# Feature Release: 4 weeks
## Documentation, etc
# BWTIM: 1 week
## The weeks should add up to the budget ;-)

== TIME BOXED RELEASE DATES == 
* R0 ends on 2016.05.06
* R1 ... from 2016.05.09 ... 2016.11.04
* R2 ... from 2016.11.14 ... 2017.04.28

== IMMEDIATE ACTION ITEMS ==
* <pre style="color: green">√ 2016.04.18 - Finalize Process Proposal, place on wiki / portal [owner: Carmine] </pre>
* 2016.04.22? - MDG Leads Meeting / Process Review [owner: ]
* 2016.04.22? - Clarify Artifact Locations - Backlog, Release Scope, Release Status, Release Results [owner: ]
* 2016.04.25? - Start CI/CD Pipeline Design [owner: ]
* 2016.05.02? - Start CI/CD Pipeline Buildout  [owner: ]
* ?? - Recreated R0 on a new environment [owner: ETSI .. ]
* ?? - Identify a Task Force to help own the setup of CI/CD .. ¿and police it longterm? [owner:]